The reason why I asked it's because I did not receive any "Failed" notification, so I assumed you did not even try. I sent the backport for a0918f1ce6 because I was notified of the failure. I'll send a backport for all the remaining patches (wherever it makes sense). Germano On 20/04/17 12:05, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:07:52AM +0100, Germano Percossi wrote:Hi Greg, With respect to the 3 patches I received notifications about, I noticed the following: a0918f1ce6 "CIFS: remove bad_network_name flag": you tried to apply it on 4.10, 4.9 and 4.4 but it failed. I sent the fixed backport. 1fa839b498 "CIFS: store results of cifs_reopen_file..": it has been put in the queue for 3.18, 4.4, 4.9 and 4.10 18ea43113f "CIFS: reconnect thread reschedule itself": it has been put in the queue for 4.9 and 4.10 Is there any reason why 1fa839b498 goes into 4 stable releases, while the others in in, respectively, 3 and 2 releases?Perhaps they do not apply to those trees? That's the reason I wouldn't add them there. If you think they do belong there, I would be glad to accept a backported version of the patches. thanks, greg k-h