Re: [backport v4.9] tpm_tis: use default timeout value if chip reports it as zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jarkko,

On 15.04.2017 17:26, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Since commit 1107d065fdf1 ("tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for
TPM access") Atmel 3203 TPM on ThinkPad X61S (TPM firmware version 13.9)
no longer works.  The initialization proceeds fine until we get and
start using chip-reported timeouts - and the chip reports C and D
timeouts of zero.

It turns out that until commit 8e54caf407b98e ("tpm: Provide a generic
means to override the chip returned timeouts") we had actually let
default timeout values remain in this case, so let's bring back this
behavior to make chips like Atmel 3203 work again.

Use a common code that was introduced by that commit so a warning is
printed in this case and /sys/class/tpm/tpm*/timeouts correctly says the
timeouts aren't chip-original.

Fixes: 1107d065fdf1 ("tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for TPM access")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Backport v4.9. Can you test it?
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c  |  6 ++--
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h  |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
index 3a9149cf0110..4c914fe25802 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
(..)
@@ -537,16 +537,15 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 		goto duration;
 	}

-	if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code) != 0 ||
-	    be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length)
-	    != sizeof(tpm_cmd.header.out) + sizeof(u32) + 4 * sizeof(u32))
-		return -EINVAL;
-

Is this part right?
These tests weren't removed by this commit as present in the mainline kernel.

Maciej




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]