On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
>> So unless I'm mistaken I don't see any problem using "depends on
>> PTP_1588_CLOCK" here.
>
> Furthermore that wouldn't be a first. See for example
> PTP_1588_CLOCK_GIANFAR, PTP_1588_CLOCK_IXP46X, DP83640_PHY, etc.
Ok, I'll give this a few rounds on the randconfig builder and submit it that way
unless I run into problems.
Arnd