Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 16:51:48 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Networking <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1703131629570.14436@knanqh.ubzr>
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> So unless I'm mistaken I don't see any problem using "depends on 
> PTP_1588_CLOCK" here.

Furthermore that wouldn't be a first. See for example 
PTP_1588_CLOCK_GIANFAR, PTP_1588_CLOCK_IXP46X, DP83640_PHY, etc.


Nicolas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
  - From: Arnd Bergmann

References:
- [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
  - From: Nicolas Pitre
- Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
  - From: Nicolas Pitre

Prev by Date: Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Perform link quality check unconditionally during long pulse
Previous by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
Next by thread: Re: [RESEND PATCH -net] cpsw/netcp: cpts depends on posix_timers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]