Re: Can you hold off on 1e793f6fc0db920400574211c48f9157a37e3945

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 09:22:04AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> The patch
> 
> commit 1e793f6fc0db920400574211c48f9157a37e3945
> Author: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri Oct 21 06:33:32 2016 -0700
> 
>     scsi: megaraid_sas: Fix data integrity failure for JBOD
> (passthrough) devices
> 
> Is fatally flawed.  There's another backported fix for it coming:
> 
> commit 5e5ec1759dd663a1d5a2f10930224dd009e500e8
> Author: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Nov 9 02:59:42 2016 -0800
> 
>     scsi: megaraid_sas: fix macro MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL to avoid
> regression
> 
> It's in a pull request now, but when it hits, could you apply both
> together to stable to avoid any stable regression issues?

Ugh, I missed that the first one went into the 4.4-stable tree, sorry
about that.  I've applied both of these to 4.8, and the second one to
4.4-stable now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]