Can you hold off on 1e793f6fc0db920400574211c48f9157a37e3945

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch

commit 1e793f6fc0db920400574211c48f9157a37e3945
Author: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Oct 21 06:33:32 2016 -0700

    scsi: megaraid_sas: Fix data integrity failure for JBOD
(passthrough) devices

Is fatally flawed.  There's another backported fix for it coming:

commit 5e5ec1759dd663a1d5a2f10930224dd009e500e8
Author: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Nov 9 02:59:42 2016 -0800

    scsi: megaraid_sas: fix macro MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL to avoid
regression

It's in a pull request now, but when it hits, could you apply both
together to stable to avoid any stable regression issues?

Thanks,

James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]