Re: Stable list vs versioning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/08/2016 07:57 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:35:19AM -0700, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> So my end goal here is to find a way for the vmware paravirtual in-tree
>> kernel modules to stop bumping version numbers on each commit / commit
>> series and start pushing important bugfixes to stable, while making
>> kernel maintainers happy and company people happy.
> Here it's better to simply drop module version at all, because not all
> patches will be backported to stable, and the version becomes confusing.
> From time to time when we backport fixes to older kernels, we find a
> driver fix refusing to apply because it also updates the version to
> something much higher than what we have. It shows how inappropriate
> these versions are. Enumerating patches between branches is not hard,
> is much more accurate than relying on a version which a single patch
> could increase while still missing other important patches.
>
> Willy

Thanks for your input Willy.

Thomas


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]