On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:28:26 -0700 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Heh. I have a queued a patch to switch it back to an inline function, > > >> but things are OK in mainline as-is so that's for 3.12. > > >> > > >> So 3.11 will have the macro implementation of on_each_cpu(), and I > > >> suggest that 3.10.x do the same. > > > > > > Thanks for that, I've now queued this up for 3.10-stable. > > > > I don't see why it is either necessary, or even desirable, to muck > > around in 3.10. To my knowledge, there are no known problems related to > > the on_each_cpu() implementation in 3.10.1. > > Ok, if there are no problems, I'll go drop this. I'm guessing if anyone > cares about ia64 and other arches hit a problem, I'll hear about it and > add this back in for 3.10. > > Andrew, any objection to me doing this? Nope. By dropping switch-to-a-macro, the code which is present in 3.10.x will have had little mainline or -next testing, but any risks from this are negligible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html