On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:34:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:26:02 +0000 "Daney, David" <David.Daney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > f21afc25f9ed4 ("smp.h: Use local_irq_{save,restore}() in !SMP version of
> > > on_each_cpu()") converted on_each_cpu() to a C function. This required
> > > inclusion of irqflags.h, which broke ia64 and mn10300 (at least) due to
> > > header ordering hell.
> > >
> >
> > Please excuse the top posting,
>
> Fixed it!
>
> > but weren't these issues resolved weeks ago?
>
> That indeed appears to be the case. Given that I'd merged the
> offending patch, it would perhaps have made sense to cc me on its
> fixes...
So, this patch is now in Linus's tree, should it be reverted? Should it
be applied to the stable tree as it was originally marked, or just
dropped and not worried about for 3.10?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html