On Fri, 20 May 2016, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Hi Ming, > > >Then looks there are two fix patches acked & tested: > > > > - the patch in this thread > > - another one "[PATCH] tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor > >blink timer." > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/17/455 > > > >So which one will be pushed to linus? > > Not that it's my call, but we may want both; the first as a safety > measure to prevent an invalid cur_blink_jiffies ever being set, and the > second one to actually fix the initialisation of vc_cur_blink_ms (and > address the warning introduced by the first). Tomi / Greg, I'd suggest - applying "tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor blink timer." to 4.7 and stable[4.2] - applying "fbcon: warn on invalid cursor blink intervals" to 4.7 - ignoring "fbcon: use default if cursor blink interval is not valid" Note: the patches don't depend on each other > I guess we could just go with the latter for stable... > > Cheers, > > Jeremy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html