Re: [PATCH 3.2 085/115] veth: don???t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/13/2016 11:21 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:57:19 -0700

How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
request the old veth behaviour?

I depend upon the opinions of the experts who work upstream on and
maintain these components, since it is an area I am not so familiar
with.

Generally speaking asking me directly for opinions on matters like
this isn't the way to go, in fact I kind of find it irritating.  It
can't all be on me.


Fair enough, thanks for your time.

Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]