On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 04:31:43PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> Stable folks,
>
> This is a backport of the efivarfs anti-bricking changes [1] for
> stable. Some fixing up was required because the series doesn't
> include the ucs2 cleanups that are in Linus' tree since they're not
> really stable material.
What stable tree(s) do you want these applied to?
And if at all possible, I'd really prefer to take the original patches,
additional things and all, for stable kernels, as 95%[1] of the time
that we take "different" ones, there are bugs.
It also makes things easier for us to take additional changes later on
for other commits in the same area. So can we just take the originals
please?
thanks,
greg k-h
[1] Totally made up number, I think the true number is 100%, but maybe
one or two patches have actually worked over the years. Most
relevant example of this is some crypto patches that were "made
simpler for stable" last week but were completely broken.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html