4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 90a88d6ef88edcfc4f644dddc7eef4ea41bccf8b upstream.
This softlockup is currently happening:
[ 444.088002] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [kworker/1:1:29]
[ 444.088002] Modules linked in: lpfc(-) qla2x00tgt(O) qla2xxx_scst(O) scst_vdisk(O) scsi_transport_fc libcrc32c scst(O) dlm configfs nfsd lockd grace nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc ed
d snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device dm_mod iTCO_wdt snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic gpio_ich iTCO_vendor_support ppdev snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hda
_core snd_hwdep tg3 snd_pcm snd_timer libphy lpc_ich parport_pc ptp acpi_cpufreq snd pps_core fjes parport i2c_i801 ehci_pci tpm_tis tpm sr_mod cdrom soundcore floppy hwmon sg 8250_
fintek pcspkr i915 drm_kms_helper uhci_hcd ehci_hcd drm fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect syscopyarea i2c_algo_bit usbcore button video usb_common fan ata_generic ata_piix libata th
ermal
[ 444.088002] CPU: 1 PID: 29 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G O 4.4.0-rc5-2.g1e923a3-default #1
[ 444.088002] Hardware name: FUJITSU SIEMENS ESPRIMO E /D2164-A1, BIOS 5.00 R1.10.2164.A1 05/08/2006
[ 444.088002] Workqueue: fc_wq_4 fc_rport_final_delete [scsi_transport_fc]
[ 444.088002] task: f6266ec0 ti: f6268000 task.ti: f6268000
[ 444.088002] EIP: 0060:[<c07e7044>] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 1
[ 444.088002] EIP is at _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x14/0x20
[ 444.088002] EAX: 00000286 EBX: f20d3800 ECX: 00000002 EDX: 00000286
[ 444.088002] ESI: f50ba800 EDI: f2146848 EBP: f6269ec8 ESP: f6269ec8
[ 444.088002] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[ 444.088002] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 08f96600 CR3: 363ae000 CR4: 000006d0
[ 444.088002] Stack:
[ 444.088002] f6269eec c066b0f7 00000286 f2146848 f50ba808 f50ba800 f50ba800 f2146a90
[ 444.088002] f2146848 f6269f08 f8f0a4ed f3141000 f2146800 f2146a90 f619fa00 00000040
[ 444.088002] f6269f40 c026cb25 00000001 166c6392 00000061 f6757140 f6136340 00000004
[ 444.088002] Call Trace:
[ 444.088002] [<c066b0f7>] scsi_remove_target+0x167/0x1c0
[ 444.088002] [<f8f0a4ed>] fc_rport_final_delete+0x9d/0x1e0 [scsi_transport_fc]
[ 444.088002] [<c026cb25>] process_one_work+0x155/0x3e0
[ 444.088002] [<c026cde7>] worker_thread+0x37/0x490
[ 444.088002] [<c027214b>] kthread+0x9b/0xb0
[ 444.088002] [<c07e72c1>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x40
What appears to be happening is that something has pinned the target
so it can't go into STARGET_DEL via final release and the loop in
scsi_remove_target spins endlessly until that happens.
The fix for this soft lockup is to not keep looping over a device that
we've called remove on but which hasn't gone into DEL state. This
patch will retain a simplistic memory of the last target and not keep
looping over it.
Reported-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@xxxxxx>
Tested-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@xxxxxx>
Fixes: 40998193560dab6c3ce8d25f4fa58a23e252ef38
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -1192,16 +1192,18 @@ static void __scsi_remove_target(struct
void scsi_remove_target(struct device *dev)
{
struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(dev->parent);
- struct scsi_target *starget;
+ struct scsi_target *starget, *last_target = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
restart:
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(starget, &shost->__targets, siblings) {
- if (starget->state == STARGET_DEL)
+ if (starget->state == STARGET_DEL ||
+ starget == last_target)
continue;
if (starget->dev.parent == dev || &starget->dev == dev) {
kref_get(&starget->reap_ref);
+ last_target = starget;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
__scsi_remove_target(starget);
scsi_target_reap(starget);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html