Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] usb: chipidea: udc: bugfixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Grzeschik <mgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:12:51AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:55:07AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> > >> Agreed. What about the multi-td patch and the rest? Are you going to
>> > >> resend them still?
>> > >
>> > > I will clean up this series first and add the following patch to it:
>> > >
>> > > usb: chipidea: udc: prepare qhead with dma_alloc_coherent
>> > >
>> > > The rest are cleanup and feature patches which will come in seperate
>> > > series, as Felipe suggested.
>> > 
>> > Felipe, since you have brought this up, which of these patches seem like
>> > v3.9 fixes to you? They are all reasonable improvements, but I see no
>> > reason sending them to v3.9, save for the first one.
>> 
>> right. Looks like except patch 1, they should all go to v3.10
>
> What about "[PATCH v8 7/8] usb: chipidea: udc: fix possible memory leak in _ep_nuke" ?
> I added the "Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" on purpose.
>
> Worth it?

Looks like a good cadidate for stable as well. I was mislead by
"possible" in the subject when scanning through the patchset. It's a
very real memory leak.

Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]