On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:12:51AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:55:07AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > > >> Agreed. What about the multi-td patch and the rest? Are you going to > > >> resend them still? > > > > > > I will clean up this series first and add the following patch to it: > > > > > > usb: chipidea: udc: prepare qhead with dma_alloc_coherent > > > > > > The rest are cleanup and feature patches which will come in seperate > > > series, as Felipe suggested. > > > > Felipe, since you have brought this up, which of these patches seem like > > v3.9 fixes to you? They are all reasonable improvements, but I see no > > reason sending them to v3.9, save for the first one. > > right. Looks like except patch 1, they should all go to v3.10 What about "[PATCH v8 7/8] usb: chipidea: udc: fix possible memory leak in _ep_nuke" ? I added the "Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" on purpose. Worth it? Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html