On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:38:17PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:29 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 09:45:59PM +0800, 陈华才 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----原始邮件----- > > > > 发件人: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > 发送时间:2024-09-13 20:53:47 (星期五) > > > > 收件人: chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, helugang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx, zhaotianrui@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > 抄送: stable-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > 主题: Patch "LoongArch: KVM: Implement kvm mmu operations" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > > > > > LoongArch: KVM: Implement kvm mmu operations > > > > > > > > to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at: > > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > > loongarch-kvm-implement-kvm-mmu-operations.patch > > > > and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory. > > > > > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > > > please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. > > > Oh, no. This patch should not be added to 6.6, because 6.6 has no KVM at all. > > > > Then why was it explicitly asked to be backported? > No, this patch wasn't asked to be backported. The second patch can be > backported, but that one touches some kvm code so Lugang backported > this one as a precondition. > > However, the right way of the second patch is dropping its kvm parts, > not backporting this one as a precondition... > > So, please also drop the second patch, unless Lugang do things right. Both are now dropped.
