On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:29 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 09:45:59PM +0800, 陈华才 wrote: > > > > > > > > > -----原始邮件----- > > > 发件人: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > 发送时间:2024-09-13 20:53:47 (星期五) > > > 收件人: chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, helugang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx, zhaotianrui@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > 抄送: stable-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > 主题: Patch "LoongArch: KVM: Implement kvm mmu operations" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree > > > > > > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > > > LoongArch: KVM: Implement kvm mmu operations > > > > > > to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at: > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > loongarch-kvm-implement-kvm-mmu-operations.patch > > > and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory. > > > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > > please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. > > Oh, no. This patch should not be added to 6.6, because 6.6 has no KVM at all. > > Then why was it explicitly asked to be backported? No, this patch wasn't asked to be backported. The second patch can be backported, but that one touches some kvm code so Lugang backported this one as a precondition. However, the right way of the second patch is dropping its kvm parts, not backporting this one as a precondition... So, please also drop the second patch, unless Lugang do things right. Huacai > > I'll go drop it now, but something is wrong with someone's testing... > > thanks, > > greg k-h
