Patch "KVM: x86/pmu: Accept 0 for absent PMU MSRs when host-initiated if !enable_pmu" has been added to the 5.19-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    KVM: x86/pmu: Accept 0 for absent PMU MSRs when host-initiated if !enable_pmu

to the 5.19-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     kvm-x86-pmu-accept-0-for-absent-pmu-msrs-when-host-i.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.19 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit a056ce6a166845c496ed36a12d7d5933069164a3
Author: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Jun 1 11:19:23 2022 +0800

    KVM: x86/pmu: Accept 0 for absent PMU MSRs when host-initiated if !enable_pmu
    
    [ Upstream commit 8e6a58e28b34e8d247e772159b8fa8f6bae39192 ]
    
    Whenever an MSR is part of KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST, as is the case for
    MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 or MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0, it has to be always retrievable
    and settable with KVM_GET_MSR and KVM_SET_MSR.
    
    Accept a zero value for these MSRs to obey the contract.
    
    Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Message-Id: <20220601031925.59693-1-likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 3f868fed9114..2334ddfbbab2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -433,11 +433,19 @@ static void kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
 
 int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 {
+	if (msr_info->host_initiated && !vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu) {
+		msr_info->data = 0;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_get_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
 }
 
 int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 {
+	if (msr_info->host_initiated && !vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu)
+		return !!msr_info->data;
+
 	kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(vcpu, msr_info->index);
 	return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_set_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
index 136039fc6d01..d93ecb25fe17 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
@@ -232,7 +232,16 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *amd_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 static bool amd_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
 {
 	/* All MSRs refer to exactly one PMC, so msr_idx_to_pmc is enough.  */
-	return false;
+	if (!host_initiated)
+		return false;
+
+	switch (msr) {
+	case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
+	case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5:
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
 }
 
 static struct kvm_pmc *amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux