This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled Revert "KVM: x86/pmu: Accept 0 for absent PMU MSRs when host-initiated if !enable_pmu" to the 5.19-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: revert-kvm-x86-pmu-accept-0-for-absent-pmu-msrs-when.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.19 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. commit b158536de85c5edd2ddde0f2d4b65a17607c72e0 Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat Jun 11 00:57:51 2022 +0000 Revert "KVM: x86/pmu: Accept 0 for absent PMU MSRs when host-initiated if !enable_pmu" [ Upstream commit 5d4283df5a0fc8299fba9443c33d219939eccc2d ] Eating reads and writes to all "PMU" MSRs when there is no PMU is wildly broken as it results in allowing accesses to _any_ MSR on Intel CPUs as intel_is_valid_msr() returns true for all host_initiated accesses. A revert of commit d1c88a402056 ("KVM: x86: always allow host-initiated writes to PMU MSRs") will soon follow. This reverts commit 8e6a58e28b34e8d247e772159b8fa8f6bae39192. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-Id: <20220611005755.753273-4-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c index 2334ddfbbab2..3f868fed9114 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c @@ -433,19 +433,11 @@ static void kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr) int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) { - if (msr_info->host_initiated && !vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu) { - msr_info->data = 0; - return 0; - } - return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_get_msr)(vcpu, msr_info); } int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) { - if (msr_info->host_initiated && !vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu) - return !!msr_info->data; - kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(vcpu, msr_info->index); return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_set_msr)(vcpu, msr_info); } diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c index d93ecb25fe17..136039fc6d01 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c @@ -232,16 +232,7 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *amd_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, static bool amd_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr) { /* All MSRs refer to exactly one PMC, so msr_idx_to_pmc is enough. */ - if (!host_initiated) - return false; - - switch (msr) { - case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3: - case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5: - return true; - default: - return false; - } + return false; } static struct kvm_pmc *amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)