Re: Allowing remote root login seems to be bad. Why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


In re allowing remote root login:

1) It's only a matter of time before the password
~    is guessed correctly. It is irrelevant that the
~    password is not in any dictionary.
2) Unknown vulnerabilities may yet be discovered.
3) A previously patched vulnerability may be
~    (un)intentionally reintroduced.
4) Do you seriously want to play the odds? How
~    much you got to lose? How much you got?
5) The stars will not always be in your favor.
6) Allowing remote root access gives the bad guys
~    a big advantage: Gets them at least halfway to
~    their goal of pwning you.
7) Why make it easier for them?
8) Fate: she's very fickle.
9) How do you know that your password will always be safe?
10) Murphy--He lives!

RedHat is probably more for experienced users who are expected to know
how to set up security policies. Debian/ubuntu seems geared more
toward inexperienced users, so Deb/Ub have decided to help protect
users from themselves.

Allowing remote root logins is useful for setting up a box. Overall
there's no advantage to it for a production box. It's a little less
convenient to have to sudo but one can get used to that quickly.

==
jd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIRVPXhpL3F+HeDrIRAvC5AJ9SfXY6VpvSlJm+tClE80ILbFav1QCfXPG/
ilgD6aa8SaXVT93TPw9vo7E=
=Emjk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Unix Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux