On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM, C. Bensend <benny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The issue is the array_walk() in sq_mb_list_encodings(), which does >> not cache its results. The attached patch is still slower than the >> pre-1.4.20 code, but it's much closer. Testing and feedback is >> appreciated. > > I've applied this patch, and it seems a little faster... Maybe a > 10 to 20% improvement? I'll keep it in place and see how it > performs. How did you quantify that? Or is it just a random guess based on how responsive the interface *seems* to you? -- Paul Lesniewski SquirrelMail Team Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
