Re: Performance issues with 1.4.20?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The issue is the array_walk() in sq_mb_list_encodings(), which does
> not cache its results.  The attached patch is still slower than the
> pre-1.4.20 code, but it's much closer.  Testing and feedback is
> appreciated.

I've applied this patch, and it seems a little faster...  Maybe a
10 to 20% improvement?  I'll keep it in place and see how it
performs.

Thanks, Paul!

Benny


-- 
"Show me on the doll where the marketing touched you."
                               -- "Mally" on Fazed.net



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
-----
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]     [Webcams]

  Powered by Linux