On 9/3/07, Tom riddle <tom8303@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello , > I have installed squirrelmail on red hat Linux,with the following > configuration > Apache-2.0.59 > php-5.2.0 > squirrelmail-1.5.1 > I have followed the steps given on squirrelmail site for Performance Tuning > http://www.squirrelmail.org/docs/admin/admin-6.html#ss6.1 > For eg. for php > a. gettext > b. IMAP server extension SM doesn't use this > c. PHP Cache.:eAccelerator > I m not able to use imap proxy as using it causes lot of failure in stress > test. Really? You might want to show the problems to the imapproxy developers (or show them here too) > For Apache setting for params like > StartServers 300 > MinSpareServers 300 > MaxSpareServers 500 > MaxClients 600 > MaxRequestsPerChild 100000 > Timeout 400 > KeepAliveTimeout 10 > I have imap which can handle 1000 req/sec per CPU. What IMAP server is it? How do you know that figure is accurate? > I m stress testing the squirrelmail for login+inbox dipslay > For total user 30000 to 40000 when tested gives req/sec between 4 to 5. > I want to improve the req/sec ratio and test for more number of user than > this. > Can anybody suggest anything to improve rps any > setting(php,Apache,squirrelmail),useful links,utility to > install FYI, 1.5.1 is quite old by now, and 1.5.2 is the newest development version, although I don't know if it's going to be faster (with all the templates code in place, it likely may be slower). You might try profiling the PHP code for fun, but that may or may not tell you anything helpful. You did enable server side sorting in the SM config, right? If you have the capability, you might try actually benchmarking the IMAP server alone (duplicate all the same IMAP commands that SM does over the command-line) -- SM will always be substantially slower than that, but it would be another more realistic number to compare with (the number you quote above may be just advertising mumbo). If I were you, I'd look to try to fix whatever is wrong with imapproxy, as it might help substantially. Otherwise, maybe someone else has some good ideas. Please keep us informed & good luck. > any special testing mechanism. > Thanks in advance. > > Tom. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
