On 2024-03-22 09:38, Andre Bolinhas wrote:
In previous versions of squid, from 3 to 5.9, I use this kind of deny
rules and they work like charm
acl AnnotateRule28 annotate_transaction accessrule=Rule28
http_access deny HTTP Group38 AnnotateRule28
This allows me to deny objects without bump / show the error page
(deny_info)
But using squid 6+ this rules stop to work and everything is allowed.
Example:
Squid 5.9 (OK)
https://ibb.co/YdKgL1Y
Squid 6.8 (NOK)
https://ibb.co/tbyY2GV
Sample of both cache.log in debug mode
https://we.tl/t-T7Nz1rVbVu
In you v6 logs, most logged transactions are allowed because a rule
similar to the one reconstructed below is matching:
http_access allow all AnnotateFinalAllow
There are similar cases in v5 logs as well, but most denied v5
transactions match the following rule instead (i.e. the one you shared
above):
http_access deny HTTP Group38 AnnotateRule28
In your Squid configuration, v6 allow rule is listed much higher than v5
deny rule (#43 vs #149). I do not see any signs of Group38 or
AnnotateRule28 ACL evaluation in v6 logs, as if the rule sets are
different for two different Squid instances. Are you using the same set
of http_access rules for both Squid versions?
Alex.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
