Search squid archive

host_verify_check behaviour in intercept mode for domain behind Loadbalancer ( multiple IPs )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi 
We recently shifted to squid 5.9 and started seeing errors in Transparent mode

SECURITY ALERT: Host header forgery detected on conn3615903 local=44.242.184.237:443 remote=10.109.176.240:8990 FD 28029 flags=17 (local IP does not match any domain IP)

Previously we were using https://github.com/NethServer/dev/issues/5348. In addition we are using client_dst_passthru off. When building 5.9, the patch was not applied cleanly and we wanted to check if things worked without this patch. They did not work.

I did check the forum responses  https://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/HostHeaderForgery. and https://docs.diladele.com/faq/squid/host_header_forgery.html. We already support explicit proxy but that is not always an option. We can create another patch to circumvent issues like  in https://github.com/NethServer/dev/issues/5348. But I wanted to know if there is a plan to make this check optional or there is some way we can workaround this problem without changing the code. Without this support, how can intercept mode work for any website which is behind a loadbalancer with multiple IPs.

Regards
Sachin
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux