On 30/09/22 02:59, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
Excellent I understand and agree with what you are saying. Is this
behaviour documented within the Squid documentation anywhere, or is this
more ‘how does the HTTP specification handle caching’?
It is HTTP basics. I have just re-phrased details from RFC 9110 and RFC
9111 to make them clearer in context of this conversation.
The details about methods can be found in
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110#name-methods
The requirements on caches are covered in
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9111#name-overview-of-cache-operation.
I am moving forward with a HTTP GET to see if that works per my use
case. I assume therefore that any other verb is simply not going to work
out the box?
Without knowing the details of your service API it is hard to answer
that question. From what you have mentioned so far I believe so. Or at
least it is the method most easily altered when you want non-default
behaviour to occur.
HTH
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
