On 5/29/21, Antony Stone <Antony.Stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think this is a question for the Knoppix packagers; we don't know what > they > did to break Squid in this way. OK, I will try all the steps again but first I will remove the installed squid version that comes with knoppix On 5/29/21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > standard port for squid, makes squid listen on port 3128 of all available > interfaces. > If that's your local machine, localhost (3128) is one of those and if you > want to stop others from accessing it, you can configure > > http_port localhost:3128 Thank you, I will try that. > it's possible that squid was compiled without unlinkd support. In such case, > you don't need that directive. > > we can guess that unlinkd lives in /media/knoppix/squid3/4.15/sbin/unlinkd > or somewhere under /media/knoppix/squid3/4.15 directory from: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/squid-the-definitive/0596001622/re58.html Name: unlinkd_program Synopsis: This is the pathname to the unlinkd program. By executing the unlink operations in this external process, Squid’s performance improves significantly. You can disable the external unlinker with the —disable-unlinkd option to ./configure. Default: unlinkd_program $prefix/libexec/unlinkd ~ but in my $prefix I don't see that folder: $ pwd /media/knoppix//squid3/4.15 $ ls -l total 0 drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 29 03:16 bin drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 29 03:14 etc drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 29 03:16 sbin drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 29 03:16 share drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 29 03:16 var $ so what could the problem be? Why doesn't squid look into the path I defined as prefix? lbrtchx _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users