Search squid archive

Re: Squid "suspending ICAP service for too many failures"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/29/21 8:38 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:

IIRC, you did not disclose timeout suspicions before. This explanation
is news to me, and it eliminates several suspects.

Sorry, I didn't say much in fact.
I gave for granted that it was C-ICAP who stopped answering; I didn't suspect a Squid bug and had no other idea.



If you are talking about Squid timing out when attempting to establish a
TCP connection with the ICAP server, then this may by as much insight as
you can get from the Squid side.

What I hoped to find in Squid logs was *what* was being passed to C-ICAP when it locked.
I'll try on the C-ICAP side then.



I do not know much about c-icap, but I would check whether its
configuration or something like crontab results in hourly restarts and
associated loss of connectivity.

AFAIK no.



The network interface or the routing tables might also be reset hourly

They live on the same host.



The ICAP server/service might be running out of descriptors or memory.

I'd expect it to log that, but I'll investigate better.



One potentially useful test is to try to connect to the ICAP server
_while the problem is happening_ using telnet or netcat. When Squid
cannot establish a connection, can you?

I'll try, but it's going to be hard, since this happens for a few minutes once a day at most.



Packet captures can tell you whether other Squid-ICAP server connections
were active at the time, whether from-Squid SYN packets were able to
reach the ICAP server, etc.

In other words, basic network troubleshooting steps...

As I said, they live on the same host, so it can't be a network problem.



Higher timeout will delay HTTP client transactions for longer periods of
time, of course. If you want to go down the road of finding workarounds,
then check whether raising that timeout actually helps. It is not yet
clear (to me) whether the connections just need more time to be
established or are simply doomed.

It's not clear to me either, but I suspect so, given the trouble only last a few minutes.




Same for disabling icap_service_failure_limit?

This is an essential ICAP service (icap_service bypass=off). I assume
there is no backup service -- no adaptation_service_set in play here. If
so, disabling the limit means that fewer HTTP transactions will be
inconvenienced in the long run than if the service were to be suspended.
  Hence, fewer ICAP errors will be delivered to Squid clients.

Agreed.



You can also enable bypass.

I guess this would open a potential for an attack.
DoS the service (antivirus), then let something nasty pass...



Fixing the problem would be a much better solution, of course.

Sure, I know these are workarounds and I'd rather avoid them, but I'll need to consider them as a last resort.



 bye & Thanks
	av.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux