I am not sure I understood but if I understand right, then probably it's better to know add config using POST. It's better to write some dynamic ACL external helper that can read config files with ttl of 10-20 seconds. This will give the overall experience a GOOD ENOUGH. So the squid is not directly accessible? Thanks! ---- Eliezer Croitoru Tech Support Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: ngtech1ltd@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: squid-users <squid-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Amos Jeffries Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 12:28 PM To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Sqlite3 with Squid On 13/12/20 11:01 am, Eliezer Croitor wrote: > Well indeed it's very similar. > I would need to think about it a bit more to grasp it again in my mind. > However in the embedded world ruby/perl/python are not usually available so.. > True. Though for limited devices you can do the same thing they do to transfer a pre-built squid.conf (and included files) with scp or just telnet. My understanding is that tools using sqlite like you describe are also using it internally for config and/or data storage anyway. Squid is not, so it is also in the category of "not usually available" for us. Long-term we have a wishlist entry to make the cachemgr API accept POST requests with config lines to add/replace to its running configuration. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
