On 10/15/20 10:06 AM, Stephen Borrill wrote: > I have also been pointed to your comment here: > https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5069#c1 Aha, I thought there was another related bug but did not check. Glad you found it! > I'm currently testing the COMM_ERROR -> NOMESSAGE patch as bug 5069 > sounds identical. Please update 5069 bug report if that code change works for you too. It will give whoever volunteers the final solution more confidence that they are on the right path. The key here is whether the error has a transient nature and does not affect the listening socket ability to accept other transactions. Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
