On 13/12/19 10:36 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
this means that we need squid compiled with openssl and iirc
there's licensing issue with distributing it as such (iirc due to openssl
and gpl licensing incompatibility)
On 12/13/19 4:59 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Key word being "distribute". Anyone is clear to *use* a privately built
installation.
The license clash occurs when one is distributing *both* OpenSSL and
Squid binaries.
On 13.12.19 07:49, Alex Rousskov wrote:
And even the very existence of that clash and its actual effects on the
parties involved are not well understood/established/agreed upon. This
is a gray legal area full of conflicting opinions and lacking solid
legal footing.
That's the reason why Debian doesn't distribute squid with openssl support.
And I prefer to use distribution-provided packages.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Saving Private Ryan...
Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N)
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
