On 12/13/19 4:59 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 13/12/19 10:36 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> this means that we need squid compiled with openssl and iirc >> there's licensing issue with distributing it as such (iirc due to openssl >> and gpl licensing incompatibility) > Key word being "distribute". Anyone is clear to *use* a privately built > installation. > > The license clash occurs when one is distributing *both* OpenSSL and > Squid binaries. And even the very existence of that clash and its actual effects on the parties involved are not well understood/established/agreed upon. This is a gray legal area full of conflicting opinions and lacking solid legal footing. Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
