On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 15:24, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/02/19 12:28 am, Walid A. Shaari wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> due to architectural or workflow issue, I would like to utilize squid to
> redirect one url to another.
>
> e.g. bing.com to google.com
> however, keep the parameters, is that doable?
>
There are two problems;
First is that those services no longer use HTTP. So you will need to
decrypt the HTTPS to get any access to the URLs.
thats doable correct via bump and splice?
Second is that they are different services by different organizations.
So the parameters have different meanings. Retaining them can cause more
problems than it solves.
in my case actually it is the same, it is an issue DNS whitlisting at work. as when a cname resolution happens it happens at the proxy end not the host end, does that make any sense?
so for example
I always thought DNS resolution happens first, then that is passed to the proxy server, in my case from tcpdump, I belive the http payload host is the one that gets resolved by the proxy, and if the proxy has a web gateway in front of it, this is where the whitelisting/black listing happens before any name resoultion/alias are resolved. am I right? I apperciate any good resources on how and where name resolution happens when proxises, load balancers and web gateways are involved
Best regards,
Walid
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
