On 04/13/2018 02:41 PM, MK2018 wrote: > Alex Rousskov wrote >> Believe it or not, there are still many Squid use cases where bumping is >> unnecessary. This includes, but is not limited to, HTTPS proxying cases >> with peek/splice/terminate rules and environments where Squid possesses >> the certificate issued by CAs trusted by clients. There are also IETF >> attempts to standardize transmission of encrypted but proxy-cachable >> content. >> >> I agree that Squid user base will shrink if nobody can bump 3rd party >> traffic, but that reduction alone will not kill Squid. > I would definitely disagree. With what? Nothing you said afterwards contradicts what I said above. Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
