On 11/01/2016 02:47 PM, Yuri Voinov wrote: > if the SSL bump will be impossible to do - > whether it should be understood that in such a situation you close the > project Squid as unnecessary? :) Seriously, why does it then need to be > in a world without HTTP? Believe it or not, there are still many Squid use cases where bumping is unnecessary. This includes, but is not limited to, HTTPS proxying cases with peek/splice/terminate rules and environments where Squid possesses the certificate issued by CAs trusted by clients. There are also IETF attempts to standardize transmission of encrypted but proxy-cachable content. I agree that Squid user base will shrink if nobody can bump 3rd party traffic, but that reduction alone will not kill Squid. Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
