On 01/22/2018 02:39 AM, Ivan Larionov wrote: > What’s wrong with rock on ext4? ext4 does a lot more than rock needs in most environments. More useless work usually means more overhead/worse performance. YMMV. > Which filesystem works better for it? In most cases, the simpler/dumber the filesystem is, the better. If you recall, rock's ultimate goal is using a raw disk partition or equivalent... Rock already does 95+% of what a simple file system does. Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
