05.12.2017 5:06, erdosain9 пишет: > mmm > > Ok, thanks > i do that but, with users (calling a new group in the domain). Instead of > this i can do a list of users in a file?? > Anyway, i do that, but instead of > http access deny acl acl > > i do > > http access allow acl !acl > > This will be the problem? or is the same? (the same "in other words") > > Thanks for your time > Usually, if one subgroup should be deny and the rest of group should allow, deny should fires first. In firewalls, if rule above fires, no other rules process for sessions which catched by fired rules (of course, if specific appropriate keyword, yes). I'm not sure, how squid process ACLs. AFAIK, first fired rule should overlap others for current session and next acls should not process. > > > -- > Sent from: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-Users-f1019091.html > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users -- "Some people, when confronted with a problem, think «I know, I'll use regular expressions.» Now they have two problems." --Jamie Zawinsk ************************** * C++: Bug to the future * **************************
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
