On 13/11/17 10:46, Bike dernikov1 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Marcus Kool
<marcus.kool@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 13/11/17 07:46, Bike dernikov1 wrote:
are you saying that you have
cache_mem 14G
If yes, you should read the memory FAQ and reduce this.
'cache_mem 14G' explains that Squid starts 'small' and grows over time.
For our case, what do you recomend. 10GB or even lower ?
Plan reading today, i hope that I will have peace, to concentrate.
cache_mem does NOT define the total memory use of Squid.
The FAQ explains it.
On a 24G system you can start with 7 GB and only after 3 days of running
without issues and verifying that the cache is 100% utilised (if not, Squid
can grow) and there is sufficient free memory, you can increase it.
Read FAQ.
Now trying to pass trough squid-internal-mgr/ reports/statistics.
For now we will stay at cache_mem 14GB, because we are modifying too
many settings at same time. Now at 99% used at 14GB if i read correctly.
Thanks for sugestions and help.
squid-internal-mgr/info output:
Cache information for squid:
Hits as % of all requests: 5min: 5.8%, 60min: 6.4%
Hits as % of bytes sent: 5min: 16.8%, 60min: 18.7%
Memory hits as % of hit requests: 5min: 64.1%, 60min: 64.9%
Disk hits as % of hit requests: 5min: 0.0%, 60min: 0.1%
Storage Swap size: 0 KB
Storage Swap capacity: 0.0% used, 0.0% free
Storage Mem size: 14195856 KB
Storage Mem capacity: 99.0% used, 1.0% free
Mean Object Size: 0.00 KB
Requests given to unlinkd: 0
Beware that he storage mem size is not the same as total memory used.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
