Hey, I am not maintain yet Debian and Ubuntu Squid-Cache packaging but I started to do so as a testing step towards the next one. My squid debian based packages are not including ecap support due to the overhead but I believe that diladele provides up-to-date Ubuntu and Maybe debian packages. I understand that you prefer Debian to push fixes into their builds but I am not deep enough in the Debian world to tell you I understand it all goes there and what affects patches being pushed into the stable build. Would you consider to use an external debian packge that follows squid stable releases? Thanks, Eliezer ---- Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matus UHLAR - fantomas Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 5:35 PM To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: debugging squid memory On 11.03.17 22:39, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >Just asking loud, is there any chance you will give run an upgrade from 3.4.8 to 3.5.24? yes, but I will have to take care of that - debian people take care of the version in debian. I prefer fixing things in debian and push fixes back to distribution. >as I have already noted in other thread, I seem to have memory leak in squid >3.4.8 (debian 8 jessie) version, only memory cache used now. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. (R)etry, (A)bort, (C)ancer _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
