27.01.2017 2:44, Matus UHLAR - fantomas пишет: >> 26.01.2017 2:22, boruc пишет: >>> After a little bit of analyzing requests and responses with WireShark I >>> noticed that many sites that weren't cached had different >>> combination of >>> below parameters: >>> >>> Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate, post-check, >>> pre-check, >>> private, public, max-age, public >>> Pragma: no-cache > > On 26.01.17 02:44, Yuri Voinov wrote: >> If the webmaster has done this - he had good reason to. Trying to break >> the RFC in this way, you break the Internet. > > Actually, no. If the webmaster has done the above - he has no damn > idea what > those mean (private and public?) , and how to provide properly cacheable > content. It was sarcasm. > > Which is very common and also a reason why many proxy admins tend to > ignore > those controls... > -- Bugs to the Future
Attachment:
0x613DEC46.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
