26.01.2017 2:22, boruc пишет:
After a little bit of analyzing requests and responses with WireShark I
noticed that many sites that weren't cached had different combination of
below parameters:
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate, post-check, pre-check,
private, public, max-age, public
Pragma: no-cache
On 26.01.17 02:44, Yuri Voinov wrote:
If the webmaster has done this - he had good reason to. Trying to break
the RFC in this way, you break the Internet.
Actually, no. If the webmaster has done the above - he has no damn idea what
those mean (private and public?) , and how to provide properly cacheable
content.
Which is very common and also a reason why many proxy admins tend to ignore
those controls...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
allows you to install Windows. -- Matthew D. Fuller
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
