Yuri Voinov wrote > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/MultipleInstances > > > 14.11.2016 20:22, Eduardo Carneiro пишет: >> Hi everyone! >> >> I have a Squid 3.5.19 with dynamic content cache using url rewrite. It's >> a >> virtual machine (VMWare) with 2 quad-core processors each. Squid proccess >> is >> 100% in one of my eight cores and the access it's getting very slow. >> >> There exists any way to compile squid with multithread option? The idea >> is >> spread this processing beetwen the 8 cores. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-multithread-tp4680488.html >> Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> squid-users mailing list >> > squid-users@.squid-cache >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > > -- > Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them. > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@.squid-cache > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > > > 0x613DEC46.asc (2K) > <http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4680489/0/0x613DEC46.asc> > signature.asc (484 bytes) > <http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4680489/1/signature.asc> >From what I understood I will need to use each instance in different ports, right? This does not solve my problem. There are any way to separate one instance for accesses and another for cache? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-multithread-tp4680488p4680490.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
