On 2016-11-05 09:22, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 5/11/2016 6:56 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
On 2016-11-04 19:42, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 5/11/2016 1:43 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote:
The configuration for splice at step 3:
# diff etc/squid.conf.default etc/squid.conf
73a74,78
https_port 3129 intercept ssl-bump cert=etc/ssl_cert/myCA.pem
generate-host-certificates
acl StepSplice at_step SslBump3
ssl_bump splice StepSplice
ssl_bump peek all
logformat squid %ts.%03tu %6tr %>a %Ss/%03>Hs %<st %rm %ru
%[un
%Sh/%<a %mt %ssl::>sni
The result:
1478256303.420 574 172.16.0.21 TCP_TUNNEL/200 6897 CONNECT
104.124.119.14:443 - ORIGINAL_DST/104.124.119.14 - www.openssl.org
Is it a bug or intended behavior? Thanks.
The person (Christos) who designed that behaviour is not reading this
mailing list very often.
Does it mean a bug report would have better chances to get noticed?
Sorry, squid-dev is the best place for that.
Amos
Thank you for the information!
Garri
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
