On 5/11/2016 6:56 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote: > On 2016-11-04 19:42, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> On 5/11/2016 1:43 a.m., Garri Djavadyan wrote: >>> The configuration for splice at step 3: >>> >>> # diff etc/squid.conf.default etc/squid.conf >>> 73a74,78 >>>> https_port 3129 intercept ssl-bump cert=etc/ssl_cert/myCA.pem >>> generate-host-certificates >>>> acl StepSplice at_step SslBump3 >>>> ssl_bump splice StepSplice >>>> ssl_bump peek all >>>> logformat squid %ts.%03tu %6tr %>a %Ss/%03>Hs %<st %rm %ru %[un >>> %Sh/%<a %mt %ssl::>sni >>> >>> >>> The result: >>> 1478256303.420 574 172.16.0.21 TCP_TUNNEL/200 6897 CONNECT >>> 104.124.119.14:443 - ORIGINAL_DST/104.124.119.14 - www.openssl.org >>> >>> >>> Is it a bug or intended behavior? Thanks. >>> >> >> The person (Christos) who designed that behaviour is not reading this >> mailing list very often. > > Does it mean a bug report would have better chances to get noticed? Sorry, squid-dev is the best place for that. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
