Search squid archive

Re: Some questions about ssl_bump.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Amos,

Looking at the squid docs for peek and splice ( http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SslPeekAndSplice ).  

# Do no harm:
# Splice indeterminate traffic.
ssl_bump splice serverIsBank
ssl_bump bump haveServerName
ssl_bump peek all
ssl_bump splice all

So my understanding of this.  

splice just passes through. 
then we bump everything else ?
then peek 
and finally splice all?

Must you bump before peek? I assume so but I'm not sure. 




On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18/11/2015 9:24 a.m., Bruce Markey wrote:
> Amos,
>
> I knew something wasn't right.
>
> Ok then I'm going to start there.  I had a heck of a time getting
> squidguard to even work due to its reliance on old berkely db packages, I'd
> be happy to see it go.
>
> So that being said. I'm going to lose squidguard.  Upgrade squid to 3.5.
>
> I haven't even looked at the 3.5 stuff.  How big of a config change am I
> looking at?  That being said, upgrade or start fresh?

For the ssl_bump lines yes. They operate very differently, with a bit of
a learning curve around the recursive/repeated ssl_bump processing.

The rest of the config change should be smooth if it was working well
with 3.3. "squid -k parse" can highlight the differences there.

>
> Thanks again. This is the first definitive answer I've gotten!.
>

Welcome.

Amos

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux