On 18/11/2015 9:24 a.m., Bruce Markey wrote: > Amos, > > I knew something wasn't right. > > Ok then I'm going to start there. I had a heck of a time getting > squidguard to even work due to its reliance on old berkely db packages, I'd > be happy to see it go. > > So that being said. I'm going to lose squidguard. Upgrade squid to 3.5. > > I haven't even looked at the 3.5 stuff. How big of a config change am I > looking at? That being said, upgrade or start fresh? For the ssl_bump lines yes. They operate very differently, with a bit of a learning curve around the recursive/repeated ssl_bump processing. The rest of the config change should be smooth if it was working well with 3.3. "squid -k parse" can highlight the differences there. > > Thanks again. This is the first definitive answer I've gotten!. > Welcome. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
