there is a way to improve it?
2015-09-18 8:25 GMT-03:00 Antony Stone <Antony.Stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Friday 18 September 2015 at 13:13:27, Jorgeley Junior wrote:
> hey guys, forgot-me? :(
Surely you can see for yourself how many connections you've had of different
types? Here are the most common (all those over 100 instances) from your list
of 5240 results
> > 290 TAG_NONE/503
> > 368 TCP_DENIED/403
> > 1421 TCP_DENIED/407
> > 680 TCP_MISS/200
> > 192 TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED/304
> > 1896 TCP_TUNNEL/200
So:
290 (5.5%) got a 503 result (service unavailable)
368 (7%) were denied by the remote server with code 403 (forbidden)
1421 (27%) were deined by the remote server with code 407 (auth required)
680 (13%) were successfully retreived from the remote servers but were not
previously in your cache
192 (3.6%) were already cached by your browser and didn't need to be retreived
1896 (36%) were successful HTTPS tunneled connections, simply being forwarded
by the proxy
This accounts for 4847 (92.5%) of your 5240 results.
As you can see, just measuring HIT and MISS is not the whole picture.
Hope that helps,
Antony.
--
Pavlov is in the pub enjoying a pint.
The barman rings for last orders, and Pavlov jumps up exclaiming "Damn! I
forgot to feed the dog!"
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
--
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
