hey guys, forgot-me? :(
2015-09-17 8:08 GMT-03:00 Jorgeley Junior <jorgeley@xxxxxxxxx>:
thank you all for the reply, here is the result of the command:
1 TAG_NONE/500
290 TAG_NONE/503
10 TAG_NONE_ABORTED/000
4 TCP_CLIENT_REFRESH_MISS/200
368 TCP_DENIED/403
1421 TCP_DENIED/407
5 TCP_HIT/200
7 TCP_HIT_ABORTED/000
7 TCP_IMS_HIT/200
39 TCP_IMS_HIT/304
1 TCP_MEM_HIT/200
680 TCP_MISS/200
39 TCP_MISS/204
1 TCP_MISS/206
9 TCP_MISS/301
30 TCP_MISS/302
70 TCP_MISS/304
8 TCP_MISS/404
29 TCP_MISS/416
1 TCP_MISS/500
3 TCP_MISS/503
16 TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000
4 TCP_MISS_ABORTED/200
1 TCP_MISS_ABORTED/206
56 TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED/200
1 TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED/416
38 TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED/200
192 TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED/304
3 TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200
10 TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/304
1896 TCP_TUNNEL/200--2015-09-17 2:12 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:On 17/09/2015 8:55 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Try to run this on you access.log:
> cat /var/log/squid/access.log|gawk '{print $4}'|sort|uniq -c
>
> This should show a list of all the cases which includes 304 status code.
> If you can post the results there will might be another side to the
> whole story in the output.
>
> Eliezer
Yes that should clarify the story a bit. As would the Squid version details.
What is clear is that over 60% of the traffic by both count and volume
is neither HIT nor MISS. The graphing / analysis tool does not account
for TUNNEL or REFRESH transactions which can happen in HTTP/1.1.
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
--
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
