Amos, Thank you for investigating the issue and replying to my frequent messages. I know this is a free project and I understand the trials that developers must go through. Just knowing that the issue has been confirmed is of great relief to me. Please let me know what I can do to help get this resolved. I'll recompile as many times as you need! Just know, it took more then 6 hours to get a crash last time. I'll be looking forward to working with you as much as possible. Best of luck, The_Spider On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 29/07/2015 11:07 a.m., The_Spider wrote: >> Will there be any investigation to the backtrace I have posted as requested? > > Yes. I looked at it but did no have time to go into it in detail until now. > > It is this: > // if the assertion below fails, we have an active comm_read conflict > assert(fd_table[conn->fd].halfClosedReader != NULL); > > Which is <http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3775> once one > accounts for code movement since 3.2. > > You may note there was a patch for this applied in 3.5.4. That was an > experiment though, Christos was awaiting feedback on whether it resolved > the whole problem or just the bit he could replicate. > It seems you have the answer - and its not a good one :-( > > Amos > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
