On 29/07/2015 11:07 a.m., The_Spider wrote: > Will there be any investigation to the backtrace I have posted as requested? Yes. I looked at it but did no have time to go into it in detail until now. It is this: // if the assertion below fails, we have an active comm_read conflict assert(fd_table[conn->fd].halfClosedReader != NULL); Which is <http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3775> once one accounts for code movement since 3.2. You may note there was a patch for this applied in 3.5.4. That was an experiment though, Christos was awaiting feedback on whether it resolved the whole problem or just the bit he could replicate. It seems you have the answer - and its not a good one :-( Amos _______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
